The Foreign Affairs Council deals with EU action abroad in line with the European Council`s strategic guidelines and ensures that EU action is coherent and coherent. The General Affairs Council coordinates the work of the Council in its various configurations and, together with the President of the European Council and the European Commission, prepares the meetings of the European Council. With the exception of the Foreign Affairs Council, chaired by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Presidency of the Council is held alternately by each Member State for a period of 6 months. The order in which the President shall perform his duties shall be determined by the Council, acting unanimously. The presidency rotates each year on 1 January and 1 January. July (2016: Netherlands and Slovakia; 2017: Malta and Estonia (3); 2018: Bulgaria and Austria; 2019: Romania and Finland; 2020: Croatia and Germany, etc.). Given this relatively rapid `turnover`, each Presidency is based on a work programme agreed with the next two Presidencies and therefore valid for a period of 18 months (“Team Presidency”). The Presidency has primary responsibility for the overall coordination of the work of the Council and the committees that contribute to it. It is also politically important as the Member State holding the Presidency enjoys a more important role on the world stage, giving small Member States in particular the opportunity to compete with the `big players` and distinguish themselves in European politics. At the heart of economic tasks is the establishment of a common market that unites the national markets of the Member States and to which all goods and services can be offered and sold under the same conditions as in an internal market and to which all EU citizens have free and equal access.

The project to create a common market was achieved essentially through the programme for the completion of the internal market by 1992, initiated by the then President of the Commission, Jacques Delors, and endorsed by the Heads of State or Government, with the Union`s institutions succeeding in establishing a legal framework for a properly functioning internal market. This framework has now been largely fleshed out by national transposition measures, so that the internal market has already become a reality. This single market is also reflected in everyday life, especially when travelling within the EU, where controls on people and goods at national borders have long since been abolished. Every social organization has a constitution. A constitution is the means by which the structure of a political system is defined. The relationship between the different parts to each other and to the whole is clarified, common objectives are defined and rules for binding decisions are established. The constitution of the EU as a confederation of states, to which very specific tasks and functions are assigned, must therefore be able to answer the same questions as the constitution of a state. Another question that arises with regard to the Constitution of the European Union is that of its organisation. What are the institutions of the Union? Given that the EU performs functions normally reserved for the Member States, does it have a government, a parliament, administrative authorities and courts as we know them in the Member States? The implementation of the tasks entrusted to the EU and the leadership of the integration process have deliberately not been left to the Member States or to international cooperation. The EU has an institutional system that allows it to give new impetus and new objectives to the unification of Europe and to create a legal body designed and binding in all Member States in the areas of its competence.

Consequently, it cannot be correct to integrate ideological or practically the case-law or the way of thinking on extradition into surrender within the Union. I am convinced that this is a completely new system. The discount is not a delivery. There is no hearing on the prosecution case pending or likely to be held in the requesting jurisdiction; And that shouldn`t be the case; and the executive branch no longer has a role. There are special relations between the Member States of the Union. Thanks to this unity, judicial cooperation between MEPs is intensified. However, there is necessarily a high degree of confidence that the other Member State will act in accordance with the highest and fundamental principles of the Union; namely, the rule of law, peace, freedom and democracy. Nevertheless, there may be circumstances in which some Member States fail in this regard.

That is why the Framework Decision provides for procedural safeguards. Footnote 55 2.8.4 Irish courts have not yet given any indication of a rebellion in the style of Solange.